Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules

[Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org>]

On Jul 10, 2013, at 08:11 AM, Alastair McKinstry wrote:

>FWIW, I think the current scheme works best.
>
>I manage a bunch of packages that have python wrappers; the package
>then pretty much _has_ to follow the current scheme, eg.
>
>Source package: silo
>Bin packages: libsilo0
>                        libsilo-dev
>                        python-silo
>                        python3-silo (coming).

This seems completely reasonable to me.

-Barry