* Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@debian.org> [2013-05-06 03:13:47 -0700]: > On 6 May 2013 00:29, Sandro Tosi <matrixhasu@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > has this been discussed *and* agreed on? I can only see Luca's mail > > for python plans, but no ack from other "members of the debian python > > board" nor the ACK from RT. > > > > Python2.6 security support ends in October 2013 upstream. Which is > well ahead of jessie freeze & release. From security point of view > alone, it would be unwise to ship python2.6 in jessie. Which imho is > serious enough reason to remove python2.6 given its potential high > exposure when used by web-frameworks. Hi, I don't think that's up for discussion. But Sandro's point was about http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573745#591 (look at point #6.) Cheers, -- Nicolas Dandrimont We are using Linux daily to UP our productivity - so UP yours! (Adapted from Pat Paulsen by Joe Sloan)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature