Re: PIL/python-imaging becomes a python package and gets Python3 support
On Monday, February 11, 2013 05:05:23 PM Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Barry Warsaw, 2013-02-11]
>
> > On Feb 11, 2013, at 03:51 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > >I'd also use python-pil and let python-imaging contain the compat code
> > >(with Depends: python-pil)
> >
> > Do you mean, get rid of the -compat package?
>
> yes
>
> > I'd rather keep that as an
> > explicit dependency so we know which packages are broken <wink>.
>
> how about replacing python-imaging with python-pil in all packages that
> do not need compat code (anymore) - this way all packages that are still
> "broken" will have python-imaging as a dependency
+1 for that and the python3 renaming.
Scott K
Reply to: