[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]



Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that
could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with
your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary
package.

if it wouldn't be "convention compliant" anyways -- may be
python-sphinx-numpydoc?  there is already python-sphinx-issuetracker ...

But the namespace is numpydoc not sphinx, so it's even more confusing, isn't it?

actually it got renamed later on into python-sphinxcontrib.issuetracker.
It might be worth checking with numpydoc people if they do not
have plans on placing numpydoc under sphinxcontrib namespace

It seems quite unlikely to happen soon IMHO.

--
Denis Laxalde


Reply to: