Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that
> could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with
> your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary
> package.
if it wouldn't be "convention compliant" anyways -- may be
python-sphinx-numpydoc? there is already python-sphinx-issuetracker ...
actually it got renamed later on into python-sphinxcontrib.issuetracker.
It might be worth checking with numpydoc people if they do not
have plans on placing numpydoc under sphinxcontrib namespace
just my .1 cents
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
Reply to: