On Sep 18, 2012, at 05:23 PM, أحمد المحمودي wrote: >On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 06:27:21PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: >> Although Xpra is mainly an application its modules can be used by frontends >> like "winswitch", packaged by yours truly. In particular winswitch have an >> ugly workaround [1] to find private Xpra modules. This is something upstream >> already complained to me about. >---end quoted text--- > > Ok, but in that case, should the package be renamed to python-xpra > since the python modules will be public ? Or can the package still > keep the name 'xpra' ? Does it make any sense to split the source package into multiple binary packages? Then the library bits would live in python-xpra (and maybe someday, python3-xpra <wink>) and the program part would live in xpra. Cheers, -Barry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature