Re: Packaging pypy
Hi Barry (2011.11.29_18:00:07_+0200)
> While chatting about this in irc (#debian-python on oftc), I mistakenly
> thought that PyPy supported PEP 3147, but I think it's only PEP 3149. 3147
> shouldn't be that difficult to support - what is your thought on adding that
> to PyPy? It would mean one less symlink farm.
One symlink farm for the entire PyPy (!py3k PyPy) sounds good.
It'd even be very unexpected for a pure-python module to have code
differences to have code differences between PyPy and cPython.
But it's quite plausible (although probably still rare-ish) for modules
with extensions to have variation in pure-python code.
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127
Reply to: