Re: Request for Review - Nuitka the Python compiler (status update, more questions)
Hello,
I created an ITP for Nuitka here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648489
Should I add some link to the debian packages there?
1. The "dch" is not picking up my email address, unlike "reportbug",
kind of annoying.
Solved.
2. I would like to remove the "inline_copy" directory with a patched
scons from the package, as it's not necessary with Debian when having
the dependency.
Solved.
3. My documentation is ".rst", so I guess, i should build-depend on
docutils, and so something, but what? Maybe that's really a distutils
question, but I wonder where to put the resulting pdf.
Solved. In /usr/share/doc/nuitka/README.pdf now.
I will add a copyright file later.
Solved.
6. The changelog talks of "unstable". Is that OK if I am building
against "testing" ?
Still not clear. I didn't setup a pbuilder yet (the command failed with
some broken dependencies I last tried). My only build time dependency is
really python at this time. It makes no sense, because I assume, I am
somehow to provide a source deb to a sponsor anyway, right?
I also renamed the "act alike python" binary "/usr/bin/Python" to
"/usr/bin/nuitka-python" as a result of the review.
So that is it, I don't know anymore of things to do. What about a
manpage, is it considered mandatory?
What should be my next step? :-)
Yours,
Kay
Reply to: