Re: question about packaging a python-based software that ships a shared object library file

To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: question about packaging a python-based software that ships a shared object library file
From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:53:04 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] AANLkTi=sBZRB5for5cukkd9NzkJpFvm422XCFLWuXjZk@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20101024192117.GB4170@biophypfr>
References: <[🔎] 20101024192117.GB4170@biophypfr>

I'm doing what you propose with fonttools and I like the solution.

If upstream is shipping it as a private extension, keeping it that way
is a good idea.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: question about packaging a python-based software that ships a shared object library file
  - From: Filippo Rusconi <rusconi-debian@laposte.net>

References:
- question about packaging a python-based software that ships a shared object library file
  - From: Filippo Rusconi <rusconi-debian@laposte.net>

Prev by Date: question about packaging a python-based software that ships a shared object library file
Next by Date: Re: question about packaging a python-based software that ships a shared object library file
Previous by thread: question about packaging a python-based software that ships a shared object library file
Next by thread: Re: question about packaging a python-based software that ships a shared object library file
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread