Re: Packaging plugins for Python applications

[Jakub Wilk <ubanus@users.sf.net>]

* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@ubuntu.com>, 2009-05-30, 01:42:
> > What is the correct umbrella to package a plugin for a Python
> > application under? DPMT or PAPT?
>
> PAPT, since it's not a module
>
> > And, is there some recommended binary package naming scheme for such
> > packages?
>
> Nope, there's only one for modules, but that doesn't apply here, so just go with
> the upstream name if it's sensible.

Well, technically Mercurial extensions *are* public Python modules. You 
can import one into your own Python program and fiddle with it. Most users 
would never do such a thing, yet it is perfectly feasible and can be 
proven useful.

--
Jakub Wilk

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature