Re: Developer workflow and DVCS
- To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Developer workflow and DVCS
- From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:02:21 +1100
- Message-id: <877i39brhu.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
- References: <85b5c3130812250654r2228fe53k310e54c2b196a7a6@mail.gmail.com> <1235748821.10759.15.camel@sp-laptop3.sp-local> <871vtjcq5s.fsf_-_@benfinney.id.au> <8b2d7b4d0902280321u7e089596p10dbe6d128a4a220@mail.gmail.com> <87sklyb4s5.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <8b2d7b4d0902281419p50562baehc2af247c246921fd@mail.gmail.com>
Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 23:00, Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> > his opinion surely counts less than the opinion of those who
> > intend to use these repositories. I don't see why you bring that
> > up.
>
> You too are not using our repository (because we are so bad that
> won't adopt bzr and svn is an ugly ugly VCS), so GvR opinion counts
> as anyone else.
This doesn't seem to be a rational conversation any more. Is it some
kind of personal attack? I can't actually make much sense out of it.
> > Can you explain the relevance? How does it address the points I've
> > made?
>
> Because you only see bzr, while there's much more DVCSes around.
Perhaps you've been reading someone else's messages? I was addressing
points specific to a comparison between Git, Bazaar, and Subversion,
so I don't understand what you're referring to.
> For me, the discussion (being this particular new "branch" or the
> original one, since no advances are made) is closed.
Thanks for that.
I welcome further discussion on the substance of what's actually been
raised, if anyone's interested.
--
\ “Progress might have been all right once, but it's gone on too |
`\ long.” —Ogden Nash |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
Reply to: