On Tue, Dec 23, 2008, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I'll argue we want something different. We want VCS that will > maximize participation. That means both keeping top contributors > happpy and keeping it accessible to newcomers. > > I don't think hg, bzr, or git obviously qualify as accesible. My > vote, fwiw, is to stay with svn until we have a documented, accessible > workflow with tool support. Fair point. -- Loïc Minier