On ven, 2008-04-04 at 19:08 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > When Python is subsequently installed, the rtupdate scripts of all > previously-installed packages should be run. > > Sound reasonable? Shall I file a bug to this effect? On python? I think it is definitely reasonable, and you can file a bug against python. > > On the other hand, I???m not sure such symbolic links are necessary for > > debugging libraries; at least they are not for usual libraries. > > The debug library names all have the same -py24 and -py25 decoration > as the non-debug ones found in libboost-python-dev. The symlinks are > to support linking with the default Python runtime. This may not be > "usual", but how else do you deal with a library supporting two Python > runtimes? This is all good for regular libraries, but as they are decorated, the debuglink information added by dh_strip should point to the decorated debugging library location, so you shouldn’t need the undecorated symbolic link for the debugging libraries. Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=