Re: Proposed update to the python policy

To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposed update to the python policy
From: Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:09:15 +0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 87k5x9pums.fsf@vertex.dottedmag.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070322021319.GA24871@borges.dodds.net> (Steve Langasek's message of "Wed\, 21 Mar 2007 19\:13\:19 -0700")
References: <[🔎] 1174504952.21961.10.camel@tomoyo> <[🔎] 20070321214429.GG26341@borges.dodds.net> <[🔎] 20070321221614.GD29527@olympe.madism.org> <[🔎] 20070321225120.GN26341@borges.dodds.net> <[🔎] 1174520837.31728.15.camel@tomoyo> <[🔎] 20070322021319.GA24871@borges.dodds.net>

Twas brillig at 19:13:19 21.03.2007 UTC-07 when Steve Langasek did gyre and gimble:

 SL> You implemented a tool that *ignored* some of the use cases that went into
 SL> the initial policy, among them the case for 'current'.

Please, give us a link to the *written* use cases, so we can map them to tools
and to policy. Not everyone can attend the conferences.

-- 
JID: dottedmag@jabber.dottedmag.net

Reply to:

References:
- Proposed update to the python policy
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Proposed update to the python policy
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Proposed update to the python policy
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
- Re: Proposed update to the python policy
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Proposed update to the python policy
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Proposed update to the python policy
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed update to the python policy
Next by Date: Re: Proposed update to the python policy
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed update to the python policy
Next by thread: Re: Proposed update to the python policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread