On 10/06/2006 Joe Wreschnig wrote: > > Please reconsider. If you don't integrate that version now, we'll most > > probably do the switch to python2.4 in the next days and we'll replace > > dh_python calls by dh_python2 calls (integrated for example in the python > > package) or we'll remove call to dh_python in favor of dh_pycentral (existing > > and in python-central) / dh_pythonsupport (not existing but quick to > > create). > > Please don't prefix non-debhelper commands with dh_ if you do this. Call > it deb_pysupport/deb_pycentral or something, and likewise please don't > mess with #DEBHELPER#. Stomping all over the namespace because you were > rejected from the package per se seems to miss Joey's point. # apt-file search /usr/bin/dh_ | grep -v debhelper cli-common-dev: usr/bin/dh_clideps cli-common-dev: usr/bin/dh_installcligac cli-common-dev: usr/bin/dh_makeclilibs defoma: usr/bin/dh_installdefoma desktop-profiles: usr/bin/dh_installlisting dh-buildinfo: usr/bin/dh_buildinfo dh-consoledata: usr/bin/dh_consoledata dh-kpatches: usr/bin/dh_installkpatches dh-lisp: usr/bin/dh_lisp dh-make: usr/bin/dh_make gaim-dev: usr/bin/dh_gaim gjdoc: usr/bin/dh_javadoc haskell-devscripts: usr/bin/dh_haskell haskell-devscripts: usr/bin/dh_haskell_build haskell-devscripts: usr/bin/dh_haskell_buildinst haskell-devscripts: usr/bin/dh_haskell_install haskell-devscripts: usr/bin/dh_haskell_prep mono-xsp-base: usr/bin/dh_installxsp ruby-pkg-tools: usr/bin/dh_rdoc tex-common: usr/bin/dh_installtex upx-ucl: usr/bin/dh_upx xml-core: usr/bin/dh_installxmlcatalogs obviously it is already common practice to integrate dh_* helper scripts in packages other than debhelper. ... jonas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature