On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:47:11PM +0200, Martin Sj?gren wrote: > m??n 2002-09-23 klockan 22.34 skrev Graham Wilson: > > > Not in my reading of python policy. As far as I can see the creation > > > of a python-module package is optional. Then again the python policy > > > document is pretty unreadable in this section and needs to be fixed. > > > If you have issues with this way of doing things (ie. no default > > > package), then please get an authoritative answer from the guys who > > > maintain python-policy (and get them to make their document clearer), > > > and then ask me again. > > > > he thought python policy was unclear on this issue. > > As I said above, I think it's unclear too, and should be more precise. > Is it the intention that if you have pythonX.Y-foo and pythonZ.W-foo you > *may*, *should* or *must* have a python-foo package? is this going to be made clear in the next revision of python policy? -- gram
Attachment:
pgpYtLFitEw1x.pgp
Description: PGP signature