Re: Packaging python-egenix-mx*
Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> Federico Di Gregorio writes:
> > On Sun, 2001-10-28 at 22:34, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> > > 3. As the policy mandates, I have made the packages depend on
> > >
> > > python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)
> > >
> > > Lintian doesn't really like that. :-) For example:
> > >
> > > E: python-egenix-mxdatetime: package-has-a-duplicate-relation python
> > > N:
> > > N: The package seems to declare a relation on another package more than
> > > N: once. This is not only sloppy but can break some tools
> > > N:
> > >
> > > Okay, this wasn't a question, just a note.
>
> Which tools are this? Basically the error should prevent something
> like python (>=1.x), python (>> 1.y).
I don't know. :-/
> > > 4. Any other comments?
> > >
> > > Oh, and if anyone wants to look at or test the packages, get them
> > > here:
> > >
> > > deb http://joel.rosdahl.net/debian/ ./
> > > deb-src http://joel.rosdahl.net/debian/ ./
>
> looks ok. Would it make sense to add a 'Replaces:' line for those
> packages without the '-egenix' part? I.E:
>
> Package: python-egenix-mxdatetime
> Replaces: python-mxdatetime
No, I don't think so, since they aren't compatible (e.g. to use
mxDateTime 1.3.0 you import DateTime, but to use mxDateTime
2.0.2 you import mx.DateTime).
> Could you copy these packages to ftp-master.debian.org in
> ~doko/www/python-uploads?
Will do today or tomorrow.
Regards,
Joel
--
Joel Rosdahl <joel@debian.org> (PGP and GPG keys available)
Reply to: