[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Updated python-happydoc to policy



On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:38:39PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Harry Henry Gebel wrote:
> > 'Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)' as an error; so I used
> > 'Depends: python (>= 2.1)' and 'Conflicts: python (>= 2.2)'
> No, this is not equivalent! 

Uh, yes, they are equivalent.

> The Conflict means that I cannot install 
> happydoc and python2.2 simultaneously, and this is not desired.

Conflicts: python2.2 would've stopped you from doing this, but that's
not what's list above.

> I know the lintian error, but this is a dpkg/apt/whatever bug, not a 
> Python-Policy bug.

dpkg, apt, testing, etc, all work fine with depends of that form. It's
used by apache modules extensively, eg.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 "Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it.
   C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who
    can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue."
		-- Mike Hoye,
		      see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt

Attachment: pgpBR4fm5RzDd.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: