Re: lintian and new python policy
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:40:33PM +0100, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Has anyone started modifying lintian? If I remember correctly,
> packages that generate lintian errors will be rejected...
Lintian is advisory only.
> Also, someone else reported that lintian complains against
> Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)
This is a lintian bug. It's not bothering to notice that one's a less-than
and the other's a greater-than.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
"Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it.
C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who
can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue."
-- Mike Hoye,
see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt
Reply to: