[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DPL candidate interviews



Hi!
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 02:47:55PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As discussed in our team meeting in february (see
> https://meetbot.debian.net/debian-publicity/2025/ ) , we plan to do interviews
> with the (four) DPL candidates for the april 2025 vote (
> https://www.debian.org/vote/2024/vote_001 ).  Five people (Anupa, Charles,
> disaster2life, eamanu, joostvb; Cc-ed) expressed interest in lending a hand.
> 
> I had a chat with disaster2life yesterday about this.
> 
> Given the short time frame, and given the fact we don't have 2 but 4 candidates
> for this term, and as discussed, we plan to do text based interviews this
> round. To keep a real time / live feeling, I suggest using IRC (bridged to
> matrix).  Next to the interview channel, we could have a dedicated channel for
> chatter among the audience; with some time for 'questions from audience
> members'.  How do people feel about that?
I like the idea. How was performed the interviews in the past? Sent the
questions via email  can be an option? But in that way we will loose the
chance to re-ask (quickly). 
> 
> As for time schedule: we just started the 3 week campaigning period, and voting
> starts at sun april 6: about 3 weeks from now.
> 
> As I see it, tasks now are:
> 
> - register 2 dedicated irc channels w/ matrix bridges
> 
> - contact the four candidates, ask them if they're open to being
>    irc-interviewed, and try to agree upon a timeslot in coordination with
>    whoever conducts the interview.
Candidates was already contacted? I can do that if you consider OK. The
timeslot should be into these 3 weeks?

> - think about subjects / questions (refer to platforms and discussion on
>    d-vote@l.d.o)
> 
> .
> 
> 
> Bye,
> 
> Joost

-- 
cheers,
        Emmanuel Arias

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  eamanu@debian.org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: 13796755BBC72BB8ABE2AEB5 FA9DEC5DE11C63F1                     
 ⠈⠳⣄

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: