Hi, Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2018-06-20): > I'm debating the wording of the EoL paragraph, specifically: > > <p>After this point release, updates to Debian 8 will no longer be made > by Debian's security and release teams, with support moving to the LTS > team. See <url "https://wiki.debian.org/LTS";>; for further details. > Users wishing to continue to receive regular security support must > upgrade to Debian 9. > </p> > > The "regular security support" phrasing doesn't sit properly. It was > intended to be regular in the sense of standard (although I don't think > that really works either), but I can see it being read as "timely > security support", and don't really want this to be getting into a > discussion on the merits of LTS. “At this time/After this final point release, only Debian 9 is/will be supported by the security and release teams, and users are encouraged to upgrade.” maybe? Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature