[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please update the debian logo of your service



Totally agree with Stefano, dedicated links for mourned logos and not mourned ones.
Better than download and use them locally in special cases, just change the URL and voila!

Regards,
Pavlos

Pavlos K. Ponos

Account Manager at nlg GmbH
PhD Candidate at University of Macedonia

View
              Pavlos K. Ponos's profile on LinkedIn

My blog: https://howtothelinuxway.wordpress.com/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't send me documents in the following formats: .doc, .docx, .xls, .xlsx, .ppt, .pptx
Instead, try and use Open Document formats: https://www.libreoffice.org
Save your money & use a Linux distro: http://distrowatch.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 01/31/2016 11:22 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:02:08PM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
The official logos are here:
https://www.debian.org/logos/
(from there I got them to put the mourning ribbon).

I suppose that for the usual logo you can hotlink there.
Uhm, I'm not entirely sure. My point is that, I suspect, we want the
official logos on that page to look "normal" also during exceptional
circumstances (e.g., for people who might want to download and store
them). Whereas the logos that appear as part of the website theme should
look exceptional during exceptional circumstances. And you can't have
both.

So I think we need a dedicated URL for logos meant to be hotlinked. And
to give someone (like the publicity team) the ability to make the files
behind those URLs point to either the normal logos, or the exceptional
ones, as needed.

I've filed a bug against www.debian.org with this proposal
https://bugs.debian.org/813341
I apologize in advance but I won't have time/energy to follow the
discussion there.  With this mail I just wanted to make sure that we
actually agree on what the requirements are.

Cheers.


Reply to: