On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 01:02:01AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: > I know it's horribly late (sorry, it's been really busy with FOSDEM), > but maye you could add that next week two years ago we released and > now are still months away from that point in time? > > If not, that may be a point worth mentioning in the next issue. What is the point of writing something like that, especially in the way you put it? Also, what is your base for the "months away" part? Did you speak with the release team about that or is that base only on speculation (surely based on some statistical inference on the RC bugs graph, but that has been shown to be wrong in the past already)? In the latter case, I don't think it would be wise to do so. YMMV. FWIW, I disagree with your time assessment. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature