[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian Project News 2011/12 frozen. Please review and translate.

Hi Fernando,

Le 2011-08-15 02:35, Fernando C. Estrada a écrit :

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:37:31AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:

Le 2011-08-13 11:24, Francesca Ciceri a écrit :

We just finished the last bits for the latest issue of the Debian Project
News to be released Monday. We would appreciate reviews and translations.

Thank you Francesca. Here are my remarks:

Thanks Filipus ;-)

[...]

<a href="http://www.emdebian.org/about/";>Emdebian</a>   is an official
sub-project of Debian for running Debian on embedded devices

Do we have a source for that?

I'm not sure to mention Emdebian as an official sub-project of Debian,
anyone else can confirm it please with a source?

"Emdebian becomes an official Debian subproject"
http://www.emdebian.org/News/2003/20030714.html

"During 2003 Emdebian became an official part of Debian as Amirix kindly
agreed to transfer the domain name to SPI, now that they were no longer
directly interested in the project." http://www.emdebian.org/about/history.html

"Emdebian has long described itself as an \"official sub project of
Debian\" but this status has never actually been granted by Debian."
http://lists.debian.org/<20110807163147.46abb016417323aafaab75af@debian.org>

   "The only references I see to Emdebian being an \"official Debian
   subproject\" are from the emdebian.org website itself - I have never
   seen mention of this from any DPL, past or present.  What makes
   Emdebian an \"official Debian subproject\"?
It was agreed with TBM when he was DPL"
http://lists.debian.org/<20110206103842.GC22368@dream.aleph1.co.uk>
Thank you for researching this. This should be more obvious, but if Wookey says so, I'm OK. 
There has been
  one<q>People behind Debian</q>   interview: with
<a href="http://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/08/07/people-behind-debian-margarita-manterola/";>Margarita Manterola, Debian Women member
</a>.

There is no need for the colon.

Not sure here, for me the colon is right, anyone else?
The sentence would be fine without the colon. I could see a colon for that meaning but phrased without the "with" (as an application of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colon_%28punctuation%29#Syntactical-descriptive ). I like Jeremiah's suggestion. 
[...]

Thank you
Reply to: