Hi, On Montag, 22. November 2010, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > No, I was trying to explain that for either interpretation, 200 was > wrong. The normal reading would mean 271, but the reading of "final > squeeze" would mean 0 RC bugs (a very dull statistic). The set of > packages that will be released as squeeze is unknown. This is wrong and you keep repeating it, just like the good troll you are. > > Why not suggest an alternative that expresses the idea in a way you > > prefer? > At this point I won't express preferences. Anything valid that Alexander > will like is fine. And at this point I like to express that it was already stated, that you please leave this project alone. I wont waste more of my time than I already did today, chealer has been trolling the Debian project for several years and I'm sick of it. Holger P.S.: I didnt cc: debian-i18n@ or debian-i18n-english@ which are mailinglists chealer has been hitting recently as well, for the sake of keeping some sanity on some lists.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.