Hi Francesco! Francesco Poli schrieb: > Can we at least start by changing the license of future DPN issues? > I would strongly recommend to gain consensus on the license to be > chosen for http://www.debian.org (2-clause-BSD or GPLv2 have been > proposed and I would be happy with this choice) and then start to at > least adopt this license for future DPN issues. Sure, no Problem. Would it be enough to add the following text (as comment) to the wiki-pages and mentioning it in the contribution page? =================== Copyright (c) 2008 <PLEASE ADD YOUR NAME HERE> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this document, to deal in the document without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the document, and to permit persons to whom the document is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the document. ================================= Or should we stay strictly with the 2-clause-BSD? Including warranty disclaimer? Yours sincerely, Alexander
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature