[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fresh thread - 2023 Debian Project survey: Sustainability



On 17050 March 1977, Mathieu O'Neil wrote:

That "likely" is better worded as "for a great number of people
anonymity will not exist for anyone seeing the real answers".
Also, that aggregate form would need to somehow mangle the following 3
questions up pretty good, I think.

A03 formal status
A04 which 3 teams most involved
A05/A05a which other foss projects involved in

Those are enough to ditch about any anonymity I think, combine it
with B01c to make it easy enough for even an AI to find out who the
submitter is. I might be an extreme example, but for me it would be
enough to truthfully answer A04 (archive, new-maintainer, salsa) and
confirm it with A05a putting OFTC..."

All response collected with LimeSurvey will be downloaded to a password-protected device in the University of Canberra and the data on LimeSurvey will be deleted after downloading. All the data analysis will be done locally, no cloud computing will be applied to prevent AI from obtaining the data. To better prevent reidentification, the raw data will not be shared to the Debian developers in our research team. Only aggregated results will be shared with the whole team for interpretation.

Are you an AI, or used one to write this? :)
Me mentioning AI was just a sidekick on how bad AI is, but the general
point is the *ease* of identifying people answering the question set and
that pretending it will be anonymous is a nice wish only.

B01c only loses when someone works for a real big company.
The reason we kept this question from the 2016 Survey is to investigate how firms’ engagement in Debian has changed over time, but all the questions in the survey are voluntary, if you feel uncomfortable answering any question feel free to skip it. We could add a sentence in this question like “If you feel uncomfortable to answer it, feel free to skip it and move on to the next one”. Would that help?

I think the whole questions I mentioned should have something above that
the combination of the answers may make it really easy to identify the
person answering.

--
bye, Joerg


Reply to: