Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?
From: Ansgar <ansgar@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 12:10:31 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] c26f770a5c41d9e36fe6abe71dd8dc2122a4148c.camel@43-1.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 2169603.xAWq891ecY@tomato>
References: <[🔎] Y3jtmIs52jJrIunf@einval.com> <[🔎] 2169603.xAWq891ecY@tomato>

On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 16:44 +0600, Judit Foglszinger wrote:
> fortune-mod has no bugs that prevent testing migration,
> it just needs a source-only upload.

Hah, an easy bug to fix :-)  I did that just now (1:1.99.1-7.3).

Ansgar

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?
  - From: David Prévot <david@tilapin.org>

References:
- Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?
  - From: "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com>
- Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?
  - From: Judit Foglszinger <urbec@riseup.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?
Next by Date: Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?
Previous by thread: Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?
Next by thread: Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread