[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Banning Norbert Preining from planet.d.o



Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> wrote on 23/03/2022 at 17:18:40+0100:

> Adam Borowski - 23.03.22, 16:46:48 CET:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 03:37:27PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> > You're not the first one with the same reaction, so here's why.
>> > 
>> > Norbert publicly lies, writting he's not packaging in Debian "thanks
>> > to the da-manager", why should we care? Quite the opposite, isn't
>> > it normal to publicly debunk it then?
>> 
>> How would he "lie" by claiming that any new packaging (NEW sources or
>> binaries) by him has been hobbled by the da-manager?
>> 
>> That's a pretty undisputable fact, what can be disputed is whether the
>> da-manager has been right doing so.
>> 
>> And a number of people has been disagreeing with that, some to the
>> point of leaving, temporarily or not, because of the way Norbert gets
>> treated. Including prolific contributors, such as Karsten Merker or
>> Dmitry Bogatov.
>
> I am astonished to see, again, how people here seem to project all 
> badness in the world onto a single former, cause expelled, Debian 
> developer. Especially one with whom I had zero problems with and one who 
> contributed a huge lot of work.

The amount of work one does/did will never be an excuse for one's
behaviour.

> I believe it to be about time for people to look into themselves for 
> their contribution to all of this conflict. It is always easier to bash 
> someone else, I know, but it does not make Debian a friendlier place to 
> begin with. It just increases the fear to be bashed for speaking out 
> one's own truth. I really still hope that Debian community can do better 
> than that.
>
> In Debian, and very importantly also in the world, we need more unity, 
> not more division. But this is only achievable when everyone does their 
> homework. One important step here would be to be more careful when using 
> a word like "lies".
>
> It is clear to me, beyond doubt, that there is disagreement here that 
> has not been resolved. One can paper over this disagreement with 
> exercising power. But it does not help the project in the long run.
>
> There is work to be done. Uneasy work. But important to do, nonetheless.

There is disagreement, but not all disagreement has to be sorted
out.

Regards,
-- 
PEB

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: