Hello Sam, On Mon 02 Dec 2019 at 09:23PM -05, Sam Hartman wrote: > Git Packaging > ============= > > We received enough comments and I believe we have a rough consensus > supporting the discussion so far. [1] [2] > > [1]: > https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/tslv9t0uj2x.fsf@suchdamage.org > [2]: > https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/tslsgmzdbgh.fsf@suchdamage.org > > I did not yet get a chance to write up the announcement of that > discussion because I was very focused on init systems this month. > In [2] I said that I wanted to move forward on a round 3 focusing on > branch formats and similar. I'm holding off until after the holidays on > that effort. I'm likely to try and hold the discussion for round 3 and > fold the debian-devel-announce writeup of rounds 2 and 3 together. My > rationale is that a couple of people commented that it would be better > to have more clear recommendations on branch format, and if we can get > that in round 3 of the discussion, we can fold that into something more > useful for everyone. > > But right now, I don't think we're focused on Git packaging; at least I > know that's not my current focus. Can I suggest that we delay this further, to February, say, or even to March? I think that it might be a contentious issue, and the project could probably do with a bit more spacing out of such discussions. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature