Re: GR proposal: mandating VcsGit and VcsBrowser for all packages, using the "gbp patches unapplied" layout, and maybe also mandating hosted on Salsa
- To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: GR proposal: mandating VcsGit and VcsBrowser for all packages, using the "gbp patches unapplied" layout, and maybe also mandating hosted on Salsa
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:01:05 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 886e0a70-842b-8bce-b1a1-a911d2854ab3@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <2679288.SETTSrNO5i@l5580>
- References: <d982c086-c05f-2df6-e5a7-492b504f954b@debian.org> <75883B15-4347-4406-BC71-5301EA686615@kitterman.com> <20190726030214.GQ7314@jadzia.comodo.priv.at> <2679288.SETTSrNO5i@l5580>
On 7/26/19 6:53 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> It's true it's not extinct, but it's close. It's only used by several dozen
> packages now. If someone wanted to push to get dpatch completely out of the
> archive this cycle, I think it would be perfectly reasonable. The project has
> voted with their feet.
I wish we had release goals again, because that would really be a
perfect fit.
Do you have the list of affected package available? How about we tackle
this in a sprint, let's say, in Vaumarcus?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Reply to: