Re: Do we want to try to find consensus before a GR?
- To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Do we want to try to find consensus before a GR?
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 23:50:28 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] d259d47f-acef-d8a9-8d31-1e0cc0c73c6e@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <tslftmuozl9.fsf_-_@suchdamage.org>
- References: <d982c086-c05f-2df6-e5a7-492b504f954b@debian.org> <20190723175505.afdcqyyfwhon5lb6@burischnitzel.preining.info> <25efaf71-7e7a-8470-a468-0edb218755b7@debian.org> <20190724043147.deag3jnu3q35nnid@burischnitzel.preining.info> <87zhl43tqw.fsf@hands.com> <6926-1563952067.256999@nf-5.MjMd.5QKK> <m3imrrvlac.fsf@debian.org> <9700-1563960842.106811@658i.RuCn.4BWk> <20190724104357.GA22943@mithrandir.lan.emorrp1.name> <75883B15-4347-4406-BC71-5301EA686615@kitterman.com> <87h87befnu.fsf@debian.org> <tslftmuozl9.fsf_-_@suchdamage.org>
On 7/25/19 6:20 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> I had been hoping to start some discussions on these issues after
> debconf.
>
> I am not really interested in doing so against the backgdrop of a
> potential GR happening at the same time.
>
>
> Thomas, would you be willing to hold off on potential GR stuff until
> after I see where we get with consensus?
Yes, sure.
Thomas
Reply to: