Re: Debian supports pridemonth?
> On the other hand, nobody but me has spoken openly to say that it was
> a mistake to issue that statement. So I'm taking that as meaning that
> there is indeed a project-wide consensus that it was ok.
> Thank you all for your contributions to this discussion.
I was actually about to write a mail to the initial topic, but then I
though that I better ignore it, as additional attention is exactly what
the "minorities" are looking for.
So, here is my +1. I found it very wrong what publicity team did. And in
my humble opinion they take way too much responsibility for no visible
benefit for Debian.
First Daniel/Norbert issue, now this, it all leaves very unpleasant
feeling. This is the last mail from me about this topic.