On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 10:52 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Altough it's not necessarily trivial to evaluate your criteria: We didn't want to give specific examples for many of them, since different distros will have different ways of working. > On Tue, 05 Sep 2017, Paul Wise wrote: > > <li>actively cooperate with Debian<li> > > Hard to evaluate but can be assumed to be true when the distribution > files bugs (and when they user tag the bugs). Yep, this could take various other forms such as sponsoring DebConf, maintaining packages in Debian, forwarding patches etc. > > <li>are actively maintained</li> > > - new releases? Some distros are rolling, "package updates happen" is fine for those. > - people responding to queries/bug reports? Seems reasonable. > > <li>are notable and established distributions</li> > > Not very specific either: > - notable? => how do you know popularity? Notability and popularity can be different, for example Tails is probably not as popular as Ubuntu but it is definitely notable. I was thinking that having a Wikipedia page could demonstrate notability, but we could also use our own judgement here. > - established? => how old must the derivative be? Maybe 1 or 2 years, at least it should be on distrowatch. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part