Stéphane Blondon wrote: > - should we add list some derivatives in /derivatives/ page? > - if yes, which criteria should be used to limit the list? I discussed this a bit more with Stéphane Blondon offlist and we came up with this proposal for the criteria and how to list derivatives. We would welcome some feedback on these new criteria. <h2 id="list">Which derivatives are available?</h2> <p> There are a number of distributions based on Debian listed in the <a href="https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Census";>Debian Derivatives Census</a> as well as in <a href="https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives#Lists";>other places</a>. </p> <p> In addition, we would like to highlight the following Debian derivatives: </p> ## Some other structure (list/table/etc) would be fine too <p> <img href="example-logo.png"/><a href="https://www.example.org/";>Example</a> is aimed at being an example derivative. <a href="https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Census/Example";>More info</a>. Similar derivatives include <a href="https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Census/Example2";>Example2</a>;, # Insert more here </li> </p> # Insert more here <p> The derivatives highlighted above have each met most of these criteria: </p> <ul> <li>actively cooperate with Debian<li> <li>are actively maintained</li> <li>have a team of people involved, including at least one Debian member</li> <li>have joined the Debian derivatives census and included a sources.list in their census page</li> <li>have a distinguishing feature or focus</li> <li>are notable and established distributions</li> </ul> -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part