On 15/03/15 at 13:05 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> [2015-03-15 12:40 +0100]: > > I agree that it should be possible to improve on identifying a > > recurring, plannable, dependable income. But there hasn't been much > > response to requests for help in the related areas. For example, I only > > got one answer to the call for help for the partners program, which > > has been stuck for months now. The auditors team is also clearly > > under-staffed. > > I think the problem with both partners programme and auditors is > that it's not entirely clear what the roles and the potentials are. > I mean, what would it mean nowadays to "help the partners > programme"? Wasn't it addressed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2015/02/msg00070.html ? Quoting: > I would like to build a small group of people in charge of this program. > > There are ideas floating around about having several levels > (platinium/gold/silver/...), and a limited duration for membership. The > team would be responsible for setting this up in a way that makes it > possible to mix different kinds of contributions using the same > rankings/levels. Then, the team would be responsible for evaluating > requests for joining the program. There's a number of pending requests > that could be used to benchmark the designed ranking. - Lucas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature