Re: Backports removed from sources.list ;-(
Am Sonntag, 19. April 2015, 20:15:04 schrieb Paul van der Vlis:
> Op 19-04-15 om 19:44 schreef Martin Steigerwald:
> >> Also, it would be nice to avoid starting threads in various places. I
> >> already answered in:
> >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764982
> I am answering this mail here, because it's not in the bug.
> > I wonder about a commented entry for backports. This way people can
> > easily enable it. I saw Ubuntu using this for some repos.
> It's easy too, to comment-out an entry.
> > I always end hand editing this on a lot of machines.
> I think most experienced people will do that. But the non-experienced
> will use the defaults. And for experienced people defaults are important
I have no issue with having it enabled by default, as I am aware, one
still needs to specifically request installing a backport. But I do think
having it inside sources.list *commented* is still better than not having
it in there at all. Thats the whole point I was trying to make.
I wasn´t against having backports in it at all.
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7