[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: On Debian not using its money (was: Q to all candidates: SWOT analysis)

On 15/03/15 at 13:05 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> [2015-03-15 12:40 +0100]:
> > I agree that it should be possible to improve on identifying a
> > recurring, plannable, dependable income. But there hasn't been much
> > response to requests for help in the related areas. For example, I only
> > got one answer to the call for help for the partners program, which
> > has been stuck for months now. The auditors team is also clearly
> > under-staffed.
> I think the problem with both partners programme and auditors is
> that it's not entirely clear what the roles and the potentials are.
> I mean, what would it mean nowadays to "help the partners
> programme"?

Wasn't it addressed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2015/02/msg00070.html ?
> I would like to build a small group of people in charge of this program.
> There are ideas floating around about having several levels
> (platinium/gold/silver/...), and a limited duration for membership.  The
> team would be responsible for setting this up in a way that makes it
> possible to mix different kinds of contributions using the same
> rankings/levels. Then, the team would be responsible for evaluating
> requests for joining the program. There's a number of pending requests
> that could be used to benchmark the designed ranking.

- Lucas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: