Re: Code of Conduct violations handling process
On 9/3/14, Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> wrote:
> * Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>, 2014-09-03, 07:59:
>>We could have an on stage censor with a switch for the microphone.
>
> And broadcast delay.
Better still, a button on everyone's seat in the audience,
so everyone can play censor - that would be a hoot!
Or perhaps a +1/-1 button, and it acts as a voting process,
whilst the +1s are winning the microphone stays on :)
This would of course remove all responsibility from the
speaker, and any sanctions would have to be brought against
all the listeners of the talk, since they are the censors, and
therefore responsible.
And then a third "COC violation" button, which causes the
last 5 minutes of the talk to be immediately broadcast to
a special "violations review" list (or live wireless bluetooth
broadcast at the event in real time), which list/ "review channel"
is of course public for anyone to sign up to - this is how the
community must work of course - group decision making :)
On the other hand, perhaps a rating system - each talk,
presentation, interview etc, is rated as G, PG, R, AO, and in
this way, listeners/ attendees can make informed decisions
about the content they wish to view/ participate in?
Cheers,
Zenaan
Reply to: