Re: Evaluation criterias for (prospective) Trusted Organizations
On 17/01/14 at 12:47 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > So, first things first, I would welcome your feedback on the TO
> > criterias. Soft deadline: 2014-02-01.
> >  https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DPL/TrustedOrganizationCriteria
> I didn't find anything really problematic in the criteria, at least not
> wrt Debian France. Let me still add some comments.
> > == The organization should share Debian's general visions ==
> > The organization's activities and political stance should generally
> > match Debian's own political and philosophical stances.
> "activities" might be a bit broad. TO might have (Debian-related)
> activities that Debian is (purposedly) not doing, and this should
> not be a blocker IMO.
> IMO we should simply tell that the TO bylaws, activities and
> political stance should not be in conflict with Debian's
> social contract.
OK, "not conflict" is indeed a better wording.
[ Your other comments are specific to Debian France -- let's not address
them now, but rather when we will discuss Debian France ]