Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> (2014-01-03):
> I think that the current policy maintenance approach is too
> bureaucratic and relies too little on the technical judgement of the
> policy editors. I would like to see the policy editors assess
> proposals not only for consensus and support, but also to consider
> proposals on their actual merit. Support (in the form of seconds) and
> consensus can be a very helpful guide to the merit of a proposal, and
> seeking consensus and second opinions is a very helpful way to avoid
> making mistakes, but IMO it is the merit of the proposal that should
> matter.
Have you seen some mistakes that would help us (or at least me)
understand which problems you're {thinking of,anticipating}?
Mraw,
KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature