[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> (2014-01-03):
> I think that the current policy maintenance approach is too
> bureaucratic and relies too little on the technical judgement of the
> policy editors.  I would like to see the policy editors assess
> proposals not only for consensus and support, but also to consider
> proposals on their actual merit.  Support (in the form of seconds) and
> consensus can be a very helpful guide to the merit of a proposal, and
> seeking consensus and second opinions is a very helpful way to avoid
> making mistakes, but IMO it is the merit of the proposal that should
> matter.

Have you seen some mistakes that would help us (or at least me)
understand which problems you're {thinking of,anticipating}?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: