Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project
Eitan Adler writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ian Jackson
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > * Personally I'm an AGPLv3 proponent. The system ought to be suitable
> > for AGPLv3 provided that its submodules are AGPLv3-compatible (and
> > if they aren't, then we can probably write a licence exception).
> > (The main program I'm thinking of here is a Ruby on Rails
> > application.) What are people's feelings about AGPLv3 ?
> It is the least-free license currently approved by the OSI.
Just out of interest, would you describe the GPLv3 as "less free" than
the MIT licence ?