[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project

Eitan Adler writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ian Jackson
> <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> > * Personally I'm an AGPLv3 proponent.  The system ought to be suitable
> >   for AGPLv3 provided that its submodules are AGPLv3-compatible (and
> >   if they aren't, then we can probably write a licence exception).
> >   (The main program I'm thinking of here is a Ruby on Rails
> >   application.)  What are people's feelings about AGPLv3 ?
> It is the least-free license currently approved by the OSI.

Just out of interest, would you describe the GPLv3 as "less free" than
the MIT licence ?


Reply to: