Re: Can CC BY 2.0 be upgraded to 3.0 ?
Bas Wijnen <email@example.com> writes:
> You're talking about the definition of a "work" here, I presume? I
> don't see how that makes any difference. It doesn't say "two or more
> works"; just one is enough.
The key phrase is "original," not "work." Original work generally means,
in US copyright law, that there is some creative component or content that
makes it copyrightable. It's the same phrase used to determine whether
something is copyrightable in the first place.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>