Re: Can CC BY 2.0 be upgraded to 3.0 ?
- To: Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>
- Cc: ftpmaster@debian.org, debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Can CC BY 2.0 be upgraded to 3.0 ?
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:28:19 -0700
- Message-id: <87fvt8zct8.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- In-reply-to: <20130913201822.GA23349@helios.localdomain> (Paul Tagliamonte's message of "Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:18:22 -0400")
- References: <20130125094136.GA13786@falafel.plessy.net> <5102784B.1010609@debian.org> <20130125140700.GA15376@falafel.plessy.net> <51029708.3000204@twerner42.de> <20130126133513.GB4263@falafel.plessy.net> <20130126140148.GA3604@jwilk.net> <20130127010406.GA27687@falafel.plessy.net> <510685AE.4000703@twerner42.de> <20130223133904.GC3875@falafel.plessy.net> <20130225134638.GA3438@falafel.plessy.net> <20130913201822.GA23349@helios.localdomain>
Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> writes:
> I missed this thread until I stumbled on a bug.
> 4b applies to derivative works only. Underscores mine.
> /
> | You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly
> | digitally perform a ____Derivative Work____ only under the terms of this
> | License, a later version of this License with the same License Elements
> | as this License, or a Creative Commons Commons license that contains
> | the same License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike
> | 2.0 Japan).
> \
> .. (etc) ...
> As such, no.
Er, I don't understand why you think this is significant. The work formed
by taking the original and putting it under a different license is
trivially a derivative work.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: