Re: Revising the Code of Conduct
Steve Langasek <email@example.com> writes:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:42:04PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> Wow, I am impressed, 5 emails out of 15150 (current search result
>> on lists.debian.org) makes me:
>> > As one of the most routinely abusive posters on Debian lists towards your
>> That is your definition of "routinely": 0.033% ?
>> Assuming that you missed 100 other emails that would still remain < 1%
>> Thanks for this enlightment on what "routinely" means in English, for you.
> Thanks for continuing to be a walking case study of why we need an
> enforceable code of conduct on Debian mailing lists.
This isn't really helping either. There's really no way that anyone can
respond positively to this sort of message, which means that even if you
feel it's warranted, it's not productive. The original point gets lost in
the back and forth of which of you can snark at the other most
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>