On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:05:33PM +0200, Francesca Ciceri wrote: > > I agree that this should go out. Just, we have "our community" twice in > > the text. <pun>Any linguistic expertise with us we could possibly > > welcome?</pun> > LOL > > Anyway, it sounds strange enough to me to suggest > > substituting the first occurrence with just "us". And, since we also > > want new contributors to also interact constructively between > > themselves, and since to me it is somewhat redundant in the first > > place, I would even feel inclined to remove the "with our community". > I'm not sure about removing the "with our community", but as this is a > style problem (and not a content one) I'd postpone the discussion on it > (asking for proofread on -l10n-english) after the vote. I can't agree with this. The wording of position statements matters - what we ratify should be posted word for word on the website. But I also think the crowdsourced review on debian-project has already been more than sufficient and don't think there's any point in further "proofreading" on -l10n-english. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature