Re: revenue sharing agreement with DuckDuckGo
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 04:45:33PM +0000, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:50:06PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > maintainers aggressively alter the default User-Agent or some other
> > indicator which would deny upstream their rightful due. Would you agree?
> I reject and resent the idea that any software project has
> the entitlement to profit off of my web traffic.
> Treating the change of a query string as theft is as ridiculous
> as broadcast TV stations telling me I'm robbing them by
> skipping commercials.
I wholly agree and I was not suggesting that we deny upstreams their
rightful due under any circumstance. I was also shocked by the Banshee
#if _FP_W_TYPE_SIZE < 32
#error "Here's a nickel kid. Go buy yourself a real computer."