Re: trademark licenses and DFSG: a summary
Craig Small <email@example.com> writes:
> Now, the only difference is the fix. For a license it is removing the
> package for a trademark it is renaming, maybe. Sentences like that are
> exactly why our proposed trademark policy should be what it is.
I'm confused. What distinction are you drawing of license versus
trademark? Trademark holders can and do grant licenses on those marks.
It seems you may be discussing a distinction of copyright versus
trademark, but I'm guessing at this point.
\ “Come on Milhouse, there’s no such thing as a soul! It’s just |
`\ something they made up to scare kids, like the Boogie Man or |
_o__) Michael Jackson.” —Bart, _The Simpsons_ |