Re: Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.
From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:31:42 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] CAKTje6GmoOSZWq3mr=8vcbgLkip+e7Z=K3-7a_qzi+Xpm0LK-A@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20111210032602.GA30471@merveille.plessy.net>
References: <20111209175343.GA17784@upsilon.cc> <[🔎] 20111210032602.GA30471@merveille.plessy.net>

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:

> PS: after this done, we need to seriously think if it would make sense to try
> to simply merge our efforts with SPDX.  We have at least one DPL and two former
> DPLs in contact with them; why wouldn't Debian as a project participate ?

Perhaps instead of finalising DEP-5, those working on it could help
make SPDX 2.0 suitable for adoption by Debian?

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.
  - From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>

References:
- Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.
  - From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.
Next by Date: Re: Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.
Previous by thread: Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.
Next by thread: Re: Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread