[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DEP5: ready for CANDIDATE?

Applied all three patches, thanks.

On to, 2011-01-13 at 09:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
> > 
> > I think I agree with your proposal to link to SPDX. Alternatively, we
> > could collect the licenses as attachments to the spec, or point at the
> > ones on the OSI site. I'd rather avoid attaching things, but otherwise
> > I'm fine with anything.
> > 
> > Charles, would you be willing to provide a patch to link to SPDX and fix
> > the FreeBSD shortname issue? I seem to have shown myself to be a bit
> > careless with this license thing, and I make sloppy edits (this is
> > probably because I find this part to be the least interesting one, and
> > one that I've dreaded for months).
> I just realised that the SPDX site is not yet ready as their license links
> point to empty pages: http://spdx.org/licenses/
> I attached three patches. The first removes the FreeBSD license, the second
> adds missing links to upstream pages, and the last points all the links to SPDX
> instead. I think that we should wait before applying the third and use the
> second in the meantime.
> In addition I noticed a minor mismatch between the SPDX license list page and
> the SPDX license spreadsheet: in the first the Apache license is ‘ASL’, and in
> the second it is ‘Apache’. The third patch may therefore need some adjustment,
> depending on how SPDX resolves this.
> Have a nice day,

Blog/wiki/website hosting with ikiwiki (free for free software):

Reply to: